The “problems of excessive or too low nozzle temperature” should be evaluated by matching the three sets of evidence on the state of the particles, the expression of the melting and the quality of the finished product. The key mechanisms for this theme are: nozzle connectors and molds, the temperature of which affects front end smelting viscosity, current salivation, lace and cooling. Melting viscosity is influenced by both the temperature, shear rate, pressure and thermal history, and equipment values must be calibrated in measured state. Therefore, the name of the material and the recommended setting can only be used as a starting point, and the actual judgement is to return to the plate number, water, filling and assistor, the single total quantity, cycle, screw structure and product requirements to confirm whether the temperature, cut and stay of the material in the equipment is safe.

At the test-model or volume-import stage, input lists should be established around “problems of excessive or too low nozzle temperature”, including feedstock suppliers and batches, technical data sheets, dry conditions, colour mother and respirator ratios, equipment and screw specifications, product and flow weight, mold temperature and existing defects. The test shall retain the raw material COA, the equipment type, the screw diameter, the single total volume, the cycle, the environmental humidity and the version of the parameters to ensure retroactive results. The main risks of this topic are: too low to form cooling and depression, too high to salivate, degrade or produce black dots in case of shutdown. Parameters must be recorded in a specific pattern to distinguish material from equipment from operational changes.

Control methods should not begin with blindly increasing temperature or pressure, but should be based on "substance state - feed drying" The sequence of screw plasticization - nozzles and fluids - product results. Parameter optimization should give priority to ensuring that materials are free of hydrolysis, overheating and unsmelting, and then discuss speed, pressure and cycle; otherwise, the appearance of satisfactory may be at the expense of long-term performance. The site adjusts only one main variable at a time, while observing the actual melting temperature, measuring time, screw twists, mats, injection pressure, product weight, colour, scent and critical dimensions. If production can only be sustained by extreme parameters, the use of a switch to cover the material or hardware boundary should be discontinued.

The verification of “problems of excessive or too low nozzle temperature” suggests a repetitious approach: observation of nozzle pressure, cold wells, radish and post-stay colours, and measurement of actual temperature. Should the supplier or batch be replaced, it should be reconfirmed using the same set of tests, moulds and test conditions, rather than simply following the old conclusions. The technical agreement between the supplier and the plant shall state the material, the sampling method, the detection project, the permitted scope and the change notification requirements. The plasticization programme can only be considered to have long-term quantitative value if the product ' s probabilities, performance, cyclicality, energy consumption and maintenance costs are met in a continuous production process.