“How to control corrosive and bottling damage when PPS materials are plasticized” is often valued only after the defects in the product have occurred, but it is more effective to establish test boundaries before testing. The key mechanisms for this theme are the common PPS high-fibre and flame-retarding levels, taking into account high temperature plasticization, wear, volatilization and corrosion. High-temperature, fluorine plastics and elastics impose more stringent requirements on equipment capacity, cleaning, safety, feed friction and time of stay. Therefore, the name of the material and the recommended setting can only be used as a starting point, and the actual judgement is to return to the plate number, water, filling and assistor, the single total quantity, cycle, screw structure and product requirements to confirm whether the temperature, cut and stay of the material in the equipment is safe.

At the stage of trial modelling or mass import, an input list should be established around “how to control corrosive and bovine wear and tear in the plasticization of PPS material”, including feedstock suppliers and batches, technical data sheets, dry conditions, colour mother and respirator ratios, specifications for equipment and screws, product and flow weights, the temperature of moulds and existing defects. Process validation is best conducted through four further phases of start-up, heat-balancing, continuous production and short-duration, and to observe whether the window remains effective. The main risks to the subject are: the dead end, long stay and the mismatch of surface materials create black spots and reduce the screw life. Parameters must be recorded in a specific pattern to distinguish material from equipment from operational changes.

Control methods should not begin with blindly increasing temperature or pressure, but should be based on "substance state - feed drying" The sequence of screw plasticization - nozzles and fluids - product results. Where the defects can be temporarily pressured by extreme temperatures or back pressure, it is more important to confirm the existence of structural, water-bearing, pollution or gaping problems. The site adjusts only one main variable at a time, while observing the actual melting temperature, measuring time, screw twists, mats, injection pressure, product weight, colour, scent and critical dimensions. If production can only be sustained by extreme parameters, the use of a switch to cover the material or hardware boundary should be discontinued.

The validation of “how to control corrosive and bottex wear during plasticization of PPS materials” suggests a repetitious approach: monitoring of melting temperature, twisting, exhausting, corrosive wear, fibre length and performance. For custom screws or surface programmes, the smelting temperature level, twirling, capacity, fibre retention and full life cost should be verified simultaneously. The technical agreement between the supplier and the plant shall state the material, the sampling method, the detection project, the permitted scope and the change notification requirements. The plasticization programme can only be considered to have long-term quantitative value if the product ' s probabilities, performance, cyclicality, energy consumption and maintenance costs are met in a continuous production process.