The problem with many delivery reporting projects is not the lack of equipment capacity, but the omission of configurations, materials, processes, curves, samples and acceptance results from the selection phase. If the plant manufacturer ' s project manager had completed the technical confirmation prior to the offer, it would have significantly reduced the risk of subsequent re-engineering and complaints.

The effectiveness of the programme needs to be verified with the same materials, moulds and test methods. In addition to size and material reports, time measurement, buffer position, pressure curve, temperature, product weight, appearance and periodicity should also be recorded, with clear acceptance windows. Data-based delivery reduces disputes and facilitates subsequent replication. Material analysis cannot remain under PPP, ABS or PA names. The specific plate number, the percentage of the product or mineral filling, the flame-retarding system, the water-bearing requirements, the permitted stay time and the recommended processing temperature should be checked. Differences in the sensitivity of viscosity, wear, corrosiveness and shearing may be apparent in the broad categories of the same material, which change the compression ratio, the three-part ratio, alloy and surface treatment.

Technical communication distinguishes between three types of objectives that must be met, desired improvement and acceptable. It is necessary to meet the hard boundary of the item for the determination of equipment and screws, and it is hoped that the improvement item will be used for the comparison of standards and specialized programmes, while the acceptable item will help to control costs and deadlines. This would avoid stacking all requirements on a screw and would make it easier for clients to understand the real value of each configuration. The focus of discussion in this paper is on configuration, materials, processes, curves, samples and acceptance results, which must correspond to the customer ' s current production conditions and not be limited to the maximum values in machine samples.

From a sales management point of view, the development of a standard delivery template that can be traced should result in a standard process that can be repeated. Each project saves original needs, computations, final drawings, test modelling data and client feedback, and can call on experience in the event of a similar machine or material, but there is still a need to reconcile key differences and not to copy the historical configuration directly.

The cost of the misconfiguration is not only the screw itself, but also the cut-off, the waste of raw materials, the testing of molds, the delay in delivery and the credibility of customers. Precautionary measures around the absence of baseline data will affect after-sales and replication projects, which are more economical than re-routing in the event of a problem; the vendor can then move from a mere offerer to a partner capable of taking on technical screening.

Validation focuses on data integrity rates and client signing. The test shall use the actual material and representative moulds of the client, retaining the batch number, dry condition, ambient temperature and sample number. When compared to old schemes, equipment, moulds and major process conditions other than screws should be as consistent as possible. For aluminum manufacturers and vendors, professionalism is reflected in the ability to translate the client language into engineering parameters and to interpret the programme into production, quality, maintenance and cost results that the client can understand. The establishment of standard processes around delivery reports will not only improve the accuracy of this selection, but also result in reusable machine and application databases.