In evaluating “how to balance the viscosity of the molten viscosity with the process temperature”, the three sets of evidence should correspond to the state of the particles, their performance and the quality of the finished product. The key mechanism for this topic is that warming usually reduces the viscosity of the melting, but excessive warming increases cooling and increases the risk of degradation. Melting viscosity is influenced by both the temperature, shear rate, pressure and thermal history, and equipment values must be calibrated in measured state. Therefore, the name of the material and the recommended setting can only be used as a starting point, and the actual judgement is to return to the plate number, water, filling and assistor, the single total quantity, cycle, screw structure and product requirements to confirm whether the temperature, cut and stay of the material in the equipment is safe.

At the test-model or volume-import phase, an input list should be established around “how to balance the melting viscosity with the process temperature”, including feedstock suppliers and batches, technical data sheets, dry conditions, colour mother and retrospect ratios, equipment and screw specifications, product and flow weight, mold temperature and existing defects. Materials, colour mothers, retrospects and assistants should be described in terms of their respective sizes and retentions; out-of-view photographs of defects and corresponding conics should also be preserved. The main risk of the subject is that, in order to reduce the constant warming of the pressure, it may be yellow, gas, cape or size drift. Parameters must be recorded in a specific pattern to distinguish material from equipment from operational changes.

Control methods should not begin with blindly increasing temperature or pressure, but should be based on "substance state - feed drying" The sequence of screw plasticization - nozzles and fluids - product results. When twisting, measuring time changes at the same time as the actual melting temperature, the material, feed and wear should first be sorted out and not compensated by an increase in temperature alone. The site adjusts only one main variable at a time, while observing the actual melting temperature, measuring time, screw twists, mats, injection pressure, product weight, colour, scent and critical dimensions. If production can only be sustained by extreme parameters, the use of a switch to cover the material or hardware boundary should be discontinued.

The verification of how “melt viscosity should be balanced with process temperature” suggests a repeatable method: the lowest available temperature is determined by pressure, actual melting temperature, filling time and material performance. In case of over-limits, the relevant batches and products should be isolated before re-entry, downgrade or stoppage is decided on the basis of retention and trend data. The technical agreement between the supplier and the plant shall state the material, the sampling method, the detection project, the permitted scope and the change notification requirements. The plasticization programme can only be considered to have long-term quantitative value if the product ' s probabilities, performance, cyclicality, energy consumption and maintenance costs are met in a continuous production process.