Whether or not [situation definition] key stations need to be prepared for the back-up screws to start from the actual production scene of the plant and not just to look at the diameter or price of the screws. It is recommended that equipment criticality, refuelling methods, overhaul windows and spare parts be first collated, and that a reference set of data be kept before and after maintenance to determine wear and tear trends. The aim of this step is to establish comparable old programme benchmarks so that subsequent screw changes can be supported by data.

The most convenient thing to ignore is the planned and unplanned downside risks. Plants should divide needs such as appearance, size, strength and odor into necessary and optimized items and write quality standards into quantum tools, sample numbers, upper and lower limits and determination rules. Vendors can make retroactive trade-offs between interoperability, earmarking and cost when there are clear values for product weight, daily production, customer quality caps and allowed stop times.

The main line of the case [design focus] is the upgrading of the screws from consumables to a key asset for predictable management. In geometric and material programmes, the measurement segment should be synchronized with the required back pressure to compensate for geometric deficiencies without excessive back pressure; and the heat should be cut with gradual compression control and sufficient corridors should be maintained for gas escape. The final solution would also need to be compatible with the wear and tear of the cylinder, the drive, the physical velocity and the current cleaning process, and would not cover up co-operation or process problems with a single high-level material.

The new [comparison validation] programme proposes to operate for at least 24 consecutive hours, with a 30-mode extraction for each stabilization phase, recording the replacement time, the amount of excess waste and the first eligible time. The test should be co-signed by the production, quality and equipment tri-partite, so as not to allow a single department to be singled out, but also to avoid using a different name for the same phenomenon in different classes because of the poor use of a uniform code. If only the first one is checked, it is easy to miss the risks associated with heat drifting, material stoppage, reversal loop return and prolonged wear and tear.

When the [stabilized production] spiral is shaped, the inspection period should be set at both running hours and the tonnage of processed raw materials, and the maximum number of repairs should be set for each drop and surface thickness recorded for the refurbishment. The time of storage, back pressure, screw velocity, noise and mass of the product shall be recorded in a uniform manner in the shift. When the above indicators change at the same time, the mechanical gaps and the state of the raw materials should be checked before the process is adjusted to avoid the use of parameters to compensate for hardware degradation.

The [integrated cost] cost statement should not simply be a screw price, and procurement prices should be annualized in accordance with the expected useful life to prevent the frequent replacement of low-price programmes to raise costs, and procurement prices should be annualized in line with the expected useful life to prevent the frequent replacement of low-cost programmes to raise costs. It is recommended that the cost per 10,000 eligible items be exported simultaneously, the cost per 1,000 operating hours and the estimated number of return months. When new programmes reduce waste, refuelling or sudden shutdowns, higher initial inputs are often offset during production.

The [Closed Ring Management] will eventually include drawing numbers, screwdriver materials, heat treatment, critical dimensions, portable tubes, process windows and acceptance data in the curriculum vitae cards. It is proposed to establish a record of refuelling weights, cleaning time and first qualifying time, with a dual inspection cycle based on operational hours and tons of processed raw materials. When there is a significant change in the feedstock formulation, retrospective ratio, product structure or target node, the applicable boundary of the “key platform need to be prepared for a back-up screw” should be reassessed, rather than defaulting on the old conclusion being permanently valid.

Title of the article: Guidelines for the selection of a plastic factory for terminal comments