[Scene definition] Compression comparison guide: From the material properties to the defects of the product, it is from the actual production scene of the plant and cannot be viewed only by the diameter of the screw or the price. It is proposed to first organize the amount of glue, screw diameter, itinerary, twist and maximum rotation, and then to use a uniform sampling method for the same product on different platforms to facilitate horizontal comparisons. The aim of this step is to establish comparable old programme benchmarks so that subsequent screw changes can be supported by data.

The most convenient thing to ignore is that the platform capacity matches the quantity of the product. The plant should set priorities using customer complaints and the in-house end-of-life Paletotu and break the daily production down into class beats, time available and modeling losses. Vendors can make retroactive trade-offs between interoperability, earmarking and cost when there are clear values for product weight, daily production, customer quality caps and allowed stop times.

[Design Focus] The main line in this case is to balance accuracy and capacity within the safe utilization factor. In geometry and materials programmes, priority should be defined between interoperability and specialization to prevent excessive specialization leading to conversion difficulties, while the screw diameter, effective itinerary and single-mode mass should be calibrated to prevent long stops. The final solution would also need to be compatible with the wear and tear of the cylinder, the drive, the physical velocity and the current cleaning process, and would not cover up co-operation or process problems with a single high-level material.

The new [comparison validation] programme proposes to operate for at least 24 consecutive hours, with a 30-mode extraction for each stabilization phase, recording the replacement time, the amount of excess waste and the first eligible time. The specimens should be kept in groups for comparison, following the testing of the head model, stabilization and long-term operation, and the poor use of uniform coding should be avoided and different names for the same phenomenon should be used for different classes. If only the first one is checked, it is easy to miss the risks associated with heat drifting, material stoppage, reversal loop return and prolonged wear and tear.

The [stabilized production] screws should be shaped to create trend maps of the pyroclastic diameter, the reverse ring gap and the inner inside of the cylinder, and a maximum number of repairs should be set for the refurbishment to record the amount and thickness of each drop and surface layer. The time of storage, back pressure, screw velocity, noise and mass of the product shall be recorded in a uniform manner in the shift. When the above indicators change at the same time, the mechanical gaps and the state of the raw materials should be checked before the process is adjusted to avoid the use of parameters to compensate for hardware degradation.

The cost statement [comprehensive cost] cannot simply be a screw price, but should be based on a cost comparison programme for every 10,000 eligible items, while showing the impact of changes in production on the current period, with three life-cycle scenarios of optimism, benchmarking and conservativeness to prevent a single hypothesis from magnifying the return on investment. It is recommended that the cost per 10,000 eligible items be exported simultaneously, the cost per 1,000 operating hours and the estimated number of return months. When new programmes reduce waste, refuelling or sudden shutdowns, higher initial inputs are often offset during production.

The [Closed Ring Management] will eventually include drawing numbers, screwdriver materials, heat treatment, critical dimensions, portable tubes, process windows and acceptance data in the curriculum vitae cards. It is proposed to observe data at single-model, hourly and three scales per 10,000 pieces, with a maximum number of repairs to record the amount of material to be removed and the thickness of the surface layer at each time. When there is a significant change in the feedstock formulation, retrospection ratio, product structure or target node, the applicable boundary of the “compression-to-chosen guide: from the characteristics of the raw material to the defects of the product” should be reassessed rather than defaulting that the old conclusion is permanently valid.

Title of article: A guide to the selection of a plastic factory at the end